MAP Scores 2001 Analysis

MAP Scores 2001 Analysis

Areas of “high performance” (50% or more students scoring advanced or proficient AND fewer than 5% scoring progressing and step 1) between 1998 and 2001:

Level Content % Adv/Prof. %Prog/Step 1 Year

  1. Carrollton Oaks science 82% 2% 2001
  2. Remington elem. math 72% 2% 2000
  3. Remington elem. math 65% 5% 2001
  4. Remington elem. social studies 86% 5% 2001
  5. Rose Acres science 66% 3% 2000
  6. Willow Brook science 58% 5% 1998
  7. Willow Brook science 61% 3% 2000
Note: 2001 areas of high performance are in bold.

Percentage of students scoring Advanced and Proficient increased districtwide in these areas:
Level Content % Change
  1. Elementary math +3%
  2. Elementary science +8%
  3. Elementary social studies +8%
  4. Middle school communication arts +5%
  5. Middle school science +2%
  6. High school social studies +5%

Percentage of students scoring Progressing or Step 1 decreased districtwide in these areas:
Level Content % Change
  1. Elementary math – 4%
  2. Elementary social studies – 6%
  3. Middle school communication arts – 7%
  4. Middle school science – 2%
  5. Middle school social studies – 5%
  6. High school communication arts – 8%
  7. High school science – 4%
  8. High school social studies – 5%


Comparisons to the state averages

  • Pattonville elementary students scored better than their peers statewide in ALL content areas and in all areas where comparisons could be made (percentage of students moving OUT of Progressing and Step 1 levels, as well as percentage of students moving into the Advanced and Proficient levels).

  • More Pattonville middle school students scored advanced and proficient than their peers statewide in communication arts and social studies. In addition, fewer Pattonville middle schoolers were scoring in the lowest two levels in these areas when compared to the state results. Although middle school scores in math and science were near state average, Pattonville must continue its efforts to boost the achievement in these areas.

  • Fewer Pattonville High School students scored at the lowest two levels in communication arts than their peers statewide. Although scores in other content areas were near state average, Pattonville must continue its efforts to boost the achievement of its oldest students.


Change over time

Number of students scoring Advanced or Proficient increased districtwide
in ALL BUT ONE** area between 1998 (first year of testing) and 2001 (current year):

Level Content % Change
  1. Elementary communication arts +4%
  2. Elementary math +5%
  3. Elementary science +7%
  4. Elementary social studies* +24%
  5. Middle school communication arts +12%
  6. Middle school math +2%
  7. Middle school science +2%
  8. Middle school social studies* +6%
  9. High school math +4%
  10. High school science +1%
  11. High school social studies* +4%

Number of students scoring Progressing or Step 1 decreased districtwide
in the ALL areas between 1998 (first year of testing) and 2001 (current year):

Level Content % Change
  1. Elementary communication arts – 4%
  2. Elementary math – 6%
  3. Elementary science – 4%
  4. Elementary social studies* – 10%
  5. Middle school communication arts – 13%
  6. Middle school math – 8%
  7. Middle school science – 3%
  8. Middle school social studies* – 4%
  9. High school communication arts – 13%
  10. High school math – 8%
  11. High school science – 7%
  12. High school social studies* – 8%

*Note: First year of testing for social studies was 1999.
**Percent of students scoring at Advanced and Proficient in high school communication arts remained unchanged between 1998 and 2001.